Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 3 views

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to two pro se plaintiffs who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It adopted the reasoning of the lower court, which denied the plaintiffs' claims. The Fourth Circuit also denied the plaintiffs' motion to supplement their informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to two pro se plaintiffs who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It adopted the reasoning of the lower court, which denied the plaintiffs' claims. The Fourth Circuit also denied the plaintiffs' motion to supplement their informal brief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1993-12-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 12 F.3d 204 Docket: 93-6863

    Original Title

    William E. Gwaltney Edward A. Ganey, Jr., and Theodore B. Guyette v. Martin J. McDade Lynn C. Phillips S. Willis Adcock Harvey Tripp, Lieutenant Franklin E. Freeman, Jr., 12 F.3d 204, 4th Cir. (1993)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to two pro se plaintiffs who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It adopted the reasoning of the lower court, which denied the plaintiffs' claims. The Fourth Circuit also denied the plaintiffs' motion to supplement their informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to two pro se plaintiffs who filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It adopted the reasoning of the lower court, which denied the plaintiffs' claims. The Fourth Circuit also denied the plaintiffs' motion to supplement their informal brief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    12 F.

    3d 204

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William E. GWALTNEY; Edward A. Ganey, Jr., PlaintiffsAppellants,
    and
    Theodore B. Guyette, Plaintiff,
    v.
    Martin J. MCDADE; Lynn C. Phillips; S. Willis Adcock;
    Harvey Tripp, Lieutenant; Franklin E. Freeman,
    Jr., Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 93-6863.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Dec. 7, 1993.

    William E. Gwaltney, Edward A. Ganey, Jr., appellants Pro Se.


    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before PHILLIPS and HAMILTON, C.J., and SPROUSE, J.
    PER CURIAM:

    OPINION
    1

    Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint.* Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gwaltney v. McDade, No. CA-93-

    239-H (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    We deny Appellants' motion to supplement their informal brief

    You might also like