Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Wright v. Lee, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Juan Demond Wright of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wright's complaint. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Wright v. Lee, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Juan Demond Wright of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wright's complaint. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-7669

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Juan Demond Wright of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wright's complaint. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Wright v. Lee, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed an appeal from Juan Demond Wright of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found the appeal frivolous, dismissing it based on the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wright's complaint. The appeals court decided the facts and legal arguments were adequately represented in the case materials and that oral arguments would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-7669

    JUAN DEMOND WRIGHT,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RANDALL E. LEE; EDWARD A. JACKSON;
    RAHMAN Y. SYKES; JEAN JOYNER,

    ABDUR
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District
    Judge. (CA-98-552-5-H)

    Submitted:

    February 11, 1999

    Decided:

    February 25, 1999

    Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Juan Demond Wright, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Juan Demond Wright appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28
    U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 1998).

    We have reviewed the record

    and the district courts opinion and find that this appeal is
    frivolous.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

    the district court. See Wright v. Lee, No. CA-98-552-5-H (E.D.N.C.


    Oct. 2, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like