Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Peltier v. Metts, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Brian E. Peltier on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2009 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Peltier v. Metts, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Brian E. Peltier on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2009 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-08-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-1173

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Brian E. Peltier on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2009 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Peltier v. Metts, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirming the district court's denial of relief to Brian E. Peltier on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so they affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its January 28, 2009 order. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument because the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-1173

    BRIAN E. PELTIER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    JOBE C. METTS, MD; MUSC; TENET SOUTH CAROLINA, d/b/a East
    Cooper
    Regional
    Medical
    Center;
    UNIVERSITY
    MEDICAL
    ASSOCIATES; J. C. NICHOLSON, JR., Circuit Court Judge State
    of SC; FLORIDA MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT, INCORPORATED; SANDRA J.
    SENN; ROBIN L. JACKSON; THE LAW FIRM OF SANDRA J. SENN;
    ROBERT H. HOOD, JR.; HOOD LAW FIRM, LLC; LINDSAY K. SMITHYANCEY; DOUGLAS PRATT-THOMAS; THE LAW FIRM OF PRATT-THOMAS
    WALKER; HUGH W. BUYCK; DARREN K. SANDERS; ALL DEFENDANTS
    INSURANCE COMPANIES, tbd at discovery phase of this trial;
    THOMAS E. KEENE, MD; RHONDA RICHARDSON, MUSC affiliation;
    SOUTH CAROLINA BUDGET AND CONTROL BOARD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, District Judge.
    (2:09-cv-00044-DCN)

    Submitted:

    July 30, 2009

    Decided:

    August 3, 2009

    Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Brian E. Peltier, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Brian E. Peltier appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Peltier v. Metts, No. 2:09-cv-00044-DCN (D.S.C. Jan. 28,

    2009).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal
    before

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like