Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Dennever Livingston, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennever Livingston's motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Dennever Livingston, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennever Livingston's motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-11-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7120

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennever Livingston's motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Dennever Livingston, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Dennever Livingston's motion to correct a clerical error in his criminal case. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, stating that the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the court already.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7120

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    DENNEVER LIVINGSTON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
    Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (2:97-cr-00039-HCM-41)

    Submitted:

    November 20, 2012

    Before TRAXLER,
    Judges.

    Chief

    Judge,

    Decided: November 27, 2012

    and

    SHEDD

    and

    FLOYD,

    Circuit

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dennever Livingston, Appellant Pro Se.


    Howard Jacob Zlotnick,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Dennever Livingston appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    motion

    to

    correct

    clerical

    error.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

    United

    States v. Livingston, No. 2:97-cr-00039-HCM-41 (E.D. Va. June 6,


    2012).
    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like