Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Mfume I v. Baker, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Mfume I v. Baker, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-02-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-7319

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Mfume I v. Baker, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-7319

    RASTAMAN MTUME OBALAJI MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert


    Lee Bailey,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    and
    HERBERT LEE BAILEY, JR.,
    versus
    GENE BAKER; BERT CHRISTY; GLORIA SMITH; ETHEL
    HORTON; EARLENE FORD,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-94-1840-0-20BD)
    Submitted:

    January 18, 1996

    Decided:

    February 15, 1996

    Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul
    Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the
    record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate
    judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mfume I v. Baker,
    No. CA-94-1840-0-20BD (D.S.C. Aug. 8, 1995). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like