Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Sparkman v. Eagleton, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Corey L. Sparkman v. Willie Eagleton, Warden, et al. The Court of Appeals dismissed Sparkman's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Sparkman v. Eagleton, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Corey L. Sparkman v. Willie Eagleton, Warden, et al. The Court of Appeals dismissed Sparkman's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-01-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7564

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Corey L. Sparkman v. Willie Eagleton, Warden, et al. The Court of Appeals dismissed Sparkman's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Sparkman v. Eagleton, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in the case of Corey L. Sparkman v. Willie Eagleton, Warden, et al. The Court of Appeals dismissed Sparkman's appeal of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny the petition.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7564

    COREY L. SPARKMAN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    WILLIE EAGLETON, Warden; CHARLES M. CONDON,
    Attorney General of the State of South
    Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (CA-00-1818-2-23)

    Submitted:

    January 17, 2002

    Decided:

    January 29, 2002

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Corey L. Sparkman, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, William Edgar Salter, III, OFFICE OF THE
    ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Corey L. Sparkman appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2001) and order on reconsideration.

    We have reviewed the

    record and the district courts opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the
    appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Sparkman v.

    Eagleton, No. CA-00-1828-2-23 (D.S.C. filed July 3, 2001, entered


    July 5, 2001; filed Aug. 13, 2001, entered Aug. 14, 2001).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like