Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Torres, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    D'Andre Torres appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a sentence reduction motion under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court's decisions and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Torres, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    D'Andre Torres appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a sentence reduction motion under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court's decisions and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-09-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6626

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    D'Andre Torres appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a sentence reduction motion under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court's decisions and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Torres, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    D'Andre Torres appealed the district court's denial of his motion to compel the government to file a sentence reduction motion under Rule 35(b) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's rulings. The appellate court determined the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the lower court's decisions and that oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6626

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    DANDRE TORRES,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior
    District Judge. (3:92-cr-00153-2)

    Submitted:

    August 24, 2007

    Decided:

    September 7, 2007

    Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    DAndre Torres, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas A. OMalley, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    DAndre

    Torres

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    denying his Motion to Compel the Government to File a Sentence


    Reduction Motion Pursuant to Rule 35(b), and the courts order
    denying his motion for reconsideration.
    record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Torres,


    No. 3:92-cr-00153-2 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 20, 2006; Apr. 11, 2007).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like