Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Perez, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    21 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting the government's motion for forfeiture of $15,716 in U.S. currency and denying Augustine Perez's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 6 and 28, 1995 rulings. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-2843

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting the government's motion for forfeiture of $15,716 in U.S. currency and denying Augustine Perez's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 6 and 28, 1995 rulings. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    21 views3 pages

    United States v. Perez, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting the government's motion for forfeiture of $15,716 in U.S. currency and denying Augustine Perez's motion for reconsideration. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. The court affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its September 6 and 28, 1995 rulings. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-2843

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    AUGUSTINE PEREZ,
    Claimant - Appellant,
    and
    $15,716.00 IN U. S. CURRENCY,
    Defendant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CA-90-4-L)
    Submitted:

    September 24, 1996

    Decided:

    October 10, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Augustine Perez, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders granting
    the Government's motion for forfeiture of property and denying
    Appellant's motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United
    States v. Perez, No. CA-90-4-L (W.D. Va. Sept. 6 & 28, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like