Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Graves v. Gwynn Gwynn & Farver, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Walter Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the law firm Gwynn, Gwynn & Farver for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1686

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the law firm Gwynn, Gwynn & Farver for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Graves v. Gwynn Gwynn & Farver, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Graves appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against the law firm Gwynn, Gwynn & Farver for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no error in the determination that the court did not have jurisdiction over the case. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1686

    WALTER B. GRAVES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    GWYNN, GWYNN & FARVER,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
    James A. Beaty, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CA-96-892-2)
    Submitted:

    September 11, 1997

    Decided:

    September 19, 1997

    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Walter B. Graves, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Jay Short, Jr., GWYNN,
    GWYNN & FARVER, L.L.P., Reidsville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his
    complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Graves v. Gwynn, Gwynn & Farver, No. CA-96-892-2 (M.D.N.C.
    Apr. 17, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like