Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    L. Ruther filed a civil action against Interfirst Capital, which was denied by the district court. Ruther filed a motion to reconsider, which was also denied. Ruther appealed both decisions. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-02-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-2184

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    L. Ruther filed a civil action against Interfirst Capital, which was denied by the district court. Ruther filed a motion to reconsider, which was also denied. Ruther appealed both decisions. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    L. Ruther filed a civil action against Interfirst Capital, which was denied by the district court. Ruther filed a motion to reconsider, which was also denied. Ruther appealed both decisions. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-2184

    L. RUTHER,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    INTERFIRST CAPITAL, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-01-554-A)

    Submitted:

    February 14, 2002

    Decided:

    February 21, 2002

    Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    L. Ruther, Appellant Pro Se. John Thorpe Lawrence Richards, TROUT
    & RICHARDS, P.L.L.C., Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    L. Ruther appeals the district courts orders denying his
    civil action and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record
    and the district courts opinions and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Ruther v. Interfirst Capital, Inc., No. CA-01-554-A (E.D. Va. filed
    Aug. 17, 2001 & entered Aug. 20, 2001; filed Sept. 7, 2001 &
    entered Sept. 13, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like