Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Idema v. Equifax Credit, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's imposition of sanctions against Jonathan Idema under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court found Idema's claims against Equifax Credit Information Services to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Idema's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Idema v. Equifax Credit, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's imposition of sanctions against Jonathan Idema under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court found Idema's claims against Equifax Credit Information Services to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Idema's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-1630

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's imposition of sanctions against Jonathan Idema under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court found Idema's claims against Equifax Credit Information Services to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Idema's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Idema v. Equifax Credit, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's imposition of sanctions against Jonathan Idema under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The district court found Idema's claims against Equifax Credit Information Services to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court denied Idema's motion for appointment of counsel and ruled that oral arguments were not necessary, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-1630

    JONATHAN IDEMA,
    Appellant,
    and
    PATRICIA DAWN GLOSSON,
    Plaintiff,
    versus
    EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a/k/a Equifax, a/k/a Equifax Options,
    a/k/a Equifax Credit Info Services,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-95-104-5-BR)

    Submitted:

    July 22, 1998

    Decided:

    Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    July 31, 1998

    Jonathan Idema, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edmond Weddington, SMITH,


    ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals the district courts order imposing sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. We have reviewed the record and the
    district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
    we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Idema v. Equifax
    Credit Info. Serv., No. CA-95-104-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Apr. 28, 1997). We
    deny Appellants motion for appointment of counsel. We further
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like