Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Ackers, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Theodore Ackers appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Ackers' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the court materials, so oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6648

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Theodore Ackers appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Ackers' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the court materials, so oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Ackers, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Theodore Ackers appealed the denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court's decision and found no reversible error. The appeals court denied Ackers' request for a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The facts and legal arguments were determined to be adequately represented in the court materials, so oral arguments would not aid the decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6648

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    THEODORE ACKERS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (CR-94-208, CA-96-755-6)

    Submitted:

    August 13, 1998

    Decided:

    September 3, 1998

    Before WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Theodore Ackers, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Francis Joseph, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district courts order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998).
    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
    United States v. Ackers, Nos. CR-94-208; CA-96-755-6 (M.D.N.C. Apr.
    6, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like