Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Gray v. Kelly, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Quincy A. Gray of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Gray's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning that Gray was not entitled to habeas relief.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7291

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Quincy A. Gray of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Gray's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning that Gray was not entitled to habeas relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Gray v. Kelly, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Quincy A. Gray of the district court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error, denying Gray's request for a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the district court's reasoning that Gray was not entitled to habeas relief.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7291

    QUINCY A. GRAY,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    LORETTA KELLY,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.
    (CA-00-1397-AM)

    Submitted:

    November 8, 2001

    Decided:

    November 16, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Quincy A. Gray, Appellant Pro Se. John H. McLees, Jr., OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Quincy A. Gray appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a cer-

    tificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning


    of the district court.

    See Gray v. Kelly, No. CA-00-1397-AM (E.D.

    Va. filed July 17, 2001; entered July 18, 2001).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like