Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilson v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Tony Wilson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wilson's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-11-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7189

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tony Wilson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wilson's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Wilson v. State of SC, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tony Wilson appealed the district court's denial of relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. Accordingly, the court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court that had denied Wilson's petition. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7189

    TONY WILSON,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; CHARLES CONDON, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Greenwood. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CA-00-2617-9-08AJ)

    Submitted:

    October 18, 2001

    Decided:

    November 15, 2001

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Tony Tyrone Wilson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief
    Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Tony Wilson appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and


    find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

    appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See Wilson v. South Carolina, No. CA-00-2617-9-08AJ

    (D.S.C. July 3, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like