Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Peoples v. Vonmutius, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Robert Peoples of two nondispositive orders issued by a magistrate judge. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders were not final orders or appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. It therefore dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denied Peoples' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-09-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-6478

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Robert Peoples of two nondispositive orders issued by a magistrate judge. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders were not final orders or appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. It therefore dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denied Peoples' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views3 pages

    Peoples v. Vonmutius, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal by Robert Peoples of two nondispositive orders issued by a magistrate judge. The court found that it did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because the orders were not final orders or appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. It therefore dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and denied Peoples' motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-6478

    ROBERT PEOPLES,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    KARL VONMUTIUS, Sargeant, Lieber Correctional Institution;
    D. NUNNALLY, Captain, Lieber Correctional Institute; KEVIN
    WILLIAMS, Officer, Liber Correctional Institute; URIEL
    PALMER, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institute; OFFICER COX;
    MARK SELBY, Officer, Lieber Correctional Institute; ALBERT
    SMITH, Corporal, Lieber Correctional Institute; DENISE
    NORWOOD, Nurse, Lieber Correctional Institute; WILLIAM
    BRIGHTHART, Captain, Lieber Correctional Institute,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Anderson.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (1:08-cv-03977-CMC-BHH)

    Submitted:

    August 26, 2010

    Decided:

    September 2, 2010

    Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Robert Peoples, Appellant Pro Se.


    Andrew Todd Darwin, Ginger
    Goforth, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spatanburg, South
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Robert Peoples seeks to appeal the magistrate judges
    nondispositive orders entered on February 18, 2010, and February
    25, 2010.

    This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

    orders, 28 U.S.C. 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and


    collateral

    orders,

    28

    U.S.C.

    1292

    (2006);

    Fed.

    R.

    Civ.

    P.

    54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).
    orders

    The orders Peoples seeks to appeal are neither final

    nor

    appealable

    interlocutory

    or

    collateral

    orders.

    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.


    Peoples

    motion

    dispense

    with

    for
    oral

    appointment
    argument

    of

    counsel

    because

    the

    is

    denied.

    facts

    and

    We
    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like