Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Young v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Larry Arnold Young appealed a district court order denying his motion for entry of default judgment. The appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall under the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As the order was not final and did not meet the criteria for an interlocutory appeal, the appeals court dismissed the case without oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Young v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Larry Arnold Young appealed a district court order denying his motion for entry of default judgment. The appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall under the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As the order was not final and did not meet the criteria for an interlocutory appeal, the appeals court dismissed the case without oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2011-06-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-6081

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Larry Arnold Young appealed a district court order denying his motion for entry of default judgment. The appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall under the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As the order was not final and did not meet the criteria for an interlocutory appeal, the appeals court dismissed the case without oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Young v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (2011)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case in which Larry Arnold Young appealed a district court order denying his motion for entry of default judgment. The appeals court dismissed the case for lack of jurisdiction because the district court's order was not a final judgment and did not fall under the limited categories of appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. As the order was not final and did not meet the criteria for an interlocutory appeal, the appeals court dismissed the case without oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-6081

    LARRY ARNOLD YOUNG,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    D. THOMPSON, Correctional Officer; DURANKO, S.I.S. Technician;
    D. SHAW, Lieutenant; UNKNOWN MAIL ROOM PERSONNEL; D. YOST,
    I.S.O.,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
    John Preston Bailey,
    Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-00066-JPB-JSK)

    Submitted:

    May 26, 2011

    Decided:

    June 1, 2011

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Larry Arnold Young, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rita R. Valdrini,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Larry

    Arnold

    Young

    seeks

    to

    appeal

    the

    district

    courts order adopting the magistrate judges recommendation and


    denying his motion for entry of default judgment.
    may

    exercise

    jurisdiction

    only

    over

    final

    orders,

    This court
    28

    U.S.C.

    1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders,


    28

    U.S.C.

    1292

    (2006);

    Fed.

    R.

    Civ.

    P.

    54(b);

    Cohen

    Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

    v.
    The

    order Young seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an


    appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
    dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
    oral

    argument

    adequately

    because

    presented

    in

    the
    the

    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    Accordingly, we
    We dispense with
    contentions
    the

    court

    are
    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like