Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Hill v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views4 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of two of Harold Hill's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints. The appeals court reviewed the records and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the claims. The appeals court modified the dismissals to be without prejudice and denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-05-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6030

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of two of Harold Hill's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints. The appeals court reviewed the records and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the claims. The appeals court modified the dismissals to be without prejudice and denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views4 pages

    Hill v. McCabe, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of two of Harold Hill's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaints. The appeals court reviewed the records and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the claims. The appeals court modified the dismissals to be without prejudice and denied Hill's motion for appointment of counsel. The court also decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 4

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6030

    HAROLD O. HILL, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SHERWOOD R. MCCABE; S. L. MELVIN; JOHN V.
    WELLONS; JAMES B. FRENCH; JAMES SMITH, Doctor,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    No. 96-6075

    HAROLD ORLANDO HILL, SR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EARL BUTLER; DAN FORD; ED GRANNIS; CUMBERLAND
    COUNTY COMMISSIONERS; JOHN DOE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District
    Judge; Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-95-849-F, CA-95-9555-CT-H)
    Submitted:

    May 14, 1996

    Decided:

    May 24, 1996

    Before HAMILTON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Harold O. Hill, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's orders dismissing
    two 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaints. We have reviewed the records and the district court's opinions regarding these claims and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the dismissals on
    the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. McCabe, No. CA-95-849F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 1995); Hill v. Butler, No. CA-95-955-5-CT-H
    (E.D.N.C. Jan. 5, 1996). We modify the orders to reflect that the
    dismissals are without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. 2106 (1988). We deny
    Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

    You might also like