Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Willis v. Butler, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James C. Willis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Willis and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-12-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7280

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James C. Willis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Willis and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Willis v. Butler, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by James C. Willis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court denied relief to Willis and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7280

    JAMES C. WILLIS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    EARL MOOSE BUTLER; DAN FORD; GLORIA WILLIAMS,
    Nurse; ARCHIE MCLOYDE; NURSE RUBY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, District Judge.
    (CA-98-354)

    Submitted:

    December 16, 1999

    Decided:

    December 30, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    James C. Willis, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Edward Canders, CUMBERLAND COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James C. Willis appeals the district courts order denying
    relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1999) complaint.

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See
    Willis v. Butler, No. CA-98-354 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 14, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like