Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 17 views

    Brown v. Foster, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph G. Brown, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several jail officials. The district court denied relief to Brown and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Brown v. Foster, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    17 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph G. Brown, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several jail officials. The district court denied relief to Brown and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 03-7221

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph G. Brown, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several jail officials. The district court denied relief to Brown and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    17 views2 pages

    Brown v. Foster, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Joseph G. Brown, Jr. under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several jail officials. The district court denied relief to Brown and the appellate court affirmed, finding no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 03-7221

    JOSEPH G. BROWN, JR.,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    OFFICER
    FOSTER,
    Jailer,
    Fauquier
    County
    Sheriffs Department; OFFICER STEWART, Jailer,
    Fauquier County Sheriffs Department; SERGEANT
    SHORTER, Officer in Charge, Fauquier County
    Sheriffs Department; DAVID A. FLOHR, Major of
    Jail Operations, Fauquier County Sheriffs
    Department,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
    Judge. (CA-03-494-2)

    Submitted:

    October 8, 2003

    Decided:

    October 24, 2003

    Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Joseph G. Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Joseph G. Brown, Jr. appeals the district courts order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28
    U.S.C. 1915A (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Brown v. Foster, No. CA-03-494-2 (E.D. Va.

    filed July 16, 2003; entered July 17, 2003).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like