Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Briggs v. Blake, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views3 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Andrea Briggs' civil action, finding it to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its November 14, 2003 order dismissing the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-06-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1103

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Andrea Briggs' civil action, finding it to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its November 14, 2003 order dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views3 pages

    Briggs v. Blake, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Andrea Briggs' civil action, finding it to be frivolous. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appeals court adopted the reasons stated by the district court in its November 14, 2003 order dismissing the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1103

    ANDREA G. BRIGGS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus

    CATHERINE C. BLAKE; J. FREDERICK MOTZ; WALTER


    E. BLACK, JR.; DEBORAH K. CHASANOW; ANDRE M.
    DAVIS; MARVIN J. GARBIS; ALEXANDER H. HARVEY,
    II; BENSON E. LEGG; PETER J. MESSITTE; WILLIAM
    M. NICKERSON; EDWARD S. NORTHROP; FREDERIC N.
    SMALKIN; ALEXANDER WILLIAMS, JR.; JOSEPH H.
    YOUNG; JOHN DOE; H. EMORY WIDENER, JR.; J.
    HARVIE WILKINSON, III; PAUL V. NIEMEYER; J.
    MICHAEL LUTTIG; KAREN J. WILLIAMS; M. BLANE
    MICHAEL; DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ; WILLIAM B.
    TRAXLER, JR.; ROBERT B. KING; ROBERT L.
    GREGORY; DENNIS L. GREGORY; DENNIS W. SHEDD;
    ALLYSON K. DUNCAN; JOHN D. BUTZNER, JR.; J.
    DICKSON PHILLIPS, JR.; ROBERT F. CHAPMAN;
    CLYDE H. HAMILTON; JANE DOE; PATRICIA S.
    CONNOR,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge.
    (CA-03-3130-WDQ-1)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2004

    Decided:

    Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    June 15, 2004

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Andrea G. Briggs, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    Andrea G. Briggs appeals the district courts order
    dismissing as frivolous her civil action. Our review of the record
    and the district courts opinion discloses no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
    court.

    See Briggs v. Blake, No. CA-03-3130-WDQ-1 (D. Md. Nov. 14,

    2003).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like