Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Gee, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's partial granting of Ricky Gee's motion to modify his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted the government's motion to seal its response brief and affirmed the district court's order, which had reduced Gee's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on a review of the facts and legal issues presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Gee, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's partial granting of Ricky Gee's motion to modify his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted the government's motion to seal its response brief and affirmed the district court's order, which had reduced Gee's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on a review of the facts and legal issues presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-8381

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's partial granting of Ricky Gee's motion to modify his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted the government's motion to seal its response brief and affirmed the district court's order, which had reduced Gee's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on a review of the facts and legal issues presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Gee, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court's partial granting of Ricky Gee's motion to modify his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted the government's motion to seal its response brief and affirmed the district court's order, which had reduced Gee's sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) based on a review of the facts and legal issues presented. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the case adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-8381

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    RICKY GEE,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 2009

    Decided:

    July 2, 2009

    Before TRAXLER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ricky Gee, Appellant Pro Se.


    Richard Daniel Cooke, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ricky Gee appeals the district courts order granting
    in part his motion for sentence modification under 18 U.S.C.
    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.
    to

    seal

    its

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we grant the Governments motion

    informal

    response

    brief

    and

    affirm

    the

    district

    courts order.

    United States v. Gee, No. 3:03-cr-00394-JRS-11

    (E.D.

    14,

    Va.

    Oct.

    2008).

    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented


    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like