Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Lord Versatile v. Gene Johnson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Lord Versatile's claims alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Versatile's action. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Lord Versatile v. Gene Johnson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Lord Versatile's claims alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Versatile's action. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-07-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6211

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Lord Versatile's claims alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Versatile's action. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Lord Versatile v. Gene Johnson, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order denying Lord Versatile's claims alleging violations of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). The district court had accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief on Versatile's action. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6211

    LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GENE JOHNSON, Director Virginia DOC; JOHN JABE, Deputy
    Director of Operations; BENJAMIN A. WRIGHT, Chairman
    Publication Review Board; W. D. JENNINGS, Ph.D, Formal
    Chairman Publication Review; LORETTA KELLY, Warden, Sussex I
    Prison; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Regional Director,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:09-cv-00120-HEH-MHL)

    Submitted:

    June 29, 2012

    Before MOTZ and


    Circuit Judge.

    SHEDD,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    and

    July 20, 2012

    HAMILTON,

    Senior

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lord Versatile, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior


    Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lord
    accepting
    relief

    the

    on

    Versatile

    appeals

    magistrate

    Versatiles

    judges

    the

    action

    district

    courts

    recommendation

    alleging

    and

    violations

    order

    denying

    under

    the

    Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA).


    We

    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Versatile v. Johnson, No. 3:09-cv-00120-HEH-MHL (E.D.

    Va. Oct. 27, 2011).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like