Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 4 views

    United States v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Michael Thompson of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the reasoning for denying the motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Michael Thompson of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the reasoning for denying the motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-10-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 99-7045

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Michael Thompson of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the reasoning for denying the motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Thompson, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Michael Thompson of the district court's denial of his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255. The appeals court reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the reasoning for denying the motion. As such, the appeals court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the case based on agreeing with the district court's reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 99-7045

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MICHAEL THOMPSON,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, District Judge.
    (CR-95-66, CA-99-167-7)

    Submitted:

    October 7, 1999

    Decided:

    October 14, 1999

    Before MURNAGHAN, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE
    OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Thompson seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    1999).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts memo-

    randum opinion and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny

    a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.

    See United States v. Thompson, Nos.

    CR-95-66; CA-99-167-7 (W.D. Va. June 30, 1999).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like