Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Oscar, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jean Claude Oscar's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Oscar, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jean Claude Oscar's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-02-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 00-6993

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jean Claude Oscar's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Oscar, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissed Jean Claude Oscar's appeal of the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 seeking to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, denying a certificate of appealability and dismissing the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 00-6993

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    JEAN CLAUDE OSCAR,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CR-93-131, CA-00-54-2)

    Submitted:

    February 8, 2001

    Decided:

    February 13, 2001

    Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Jean Claude Oscar, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr.,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Arenda L. Wright Allen, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Kevin Michael Comstock, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jean Claude Oscar seeks to appeal the district courts orders
    denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West Supp.
    2000).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts opin-

    ions and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we deny a certif-

    icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of


    the district court.

    See United States v. Oscar, Nos. CR-93-131;

    CA-00-54-2 (E.D. Va. July 7 & July 25, 2000).

    We dispense with

    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like