Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Shawn Randle, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Shawn Dewayne Randle's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 27, 2012 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-02-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7632

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Shawn Dewayne Randle's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 27, 2012 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    United States v. Shawn Randle, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Shawn Dewayne Randle's motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. As such, the appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in its July 27, 2012 opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7632

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    SHAWN DEWAYNE RANDLE,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    James C. Turk, Senior
    District Judge. (7:07-cr-00084-JCT-4)

    Submitted:

    January 23, 2013

    Before NIEMEYER and


    Senior Circuit Judge.

    GREGORY,

    Decided:

    Circuit

    Judges,

    February 8, 2013

    and

    HAMILTON,

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Shawn Dewayne Randle, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day,


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Roanoke,
    Virginia,
    for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Shawn
    order

    denying

    Dewayne
    his

    18

    reduction of sentence.
    reversible error.

    Randle
    U.S.C.

    appeals

    the

    3582(c)(2)

    district
    (2006)

    courts

    motion

    for

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Randle, No. 7:07-cr-

    00084-JCT-4 (W.D. Va. July 27, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like