Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Porter, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting Emjadia Porter's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in United States v. Porter. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-03-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 08-6758

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting Emjadia Porter's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in United States v. Porter. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    United States v. Porter, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's orders granting Emjadia Porter's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c) and denying his motion for reconsideration. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's rulings for the reasons stated in United States v. Porter. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 08-6758

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    EMJADIA PORTER, a/k/a Troy Miller,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Samuel G. Wilson, District
    Judge. (7:94-cr-00037-sgw)

    Submitted:

    February 26, 2009

    Decided:

    March 4, 2009

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Emjadia Porter, Appellant Pro Se.


    Assistant
    United
    States
    Attorney,
    Appellee.

    Donald
    Roanoke,

    Ray Wolthuis,
    Virginia,
    for

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Emjadia

    Porter

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    United States v. Porter, No. 7:94-cr-00037-sgw (W.D. Va.

    Apr. 7 & 23, 2008).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like