Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Timothy Lafon Murphy appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Murphy's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7813

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Timothy Lafon Murphy appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Murphy's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    United States v. Murphy, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Timothy Lafon Murphy appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appellate court affirmed the district court's decision to deny Murphy's motion for the reasons stated by the lower court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7813

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    TIMOTHY LAFON MURPHY, a/k/a TJ,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Louise W. Flanagan,
    Chief District Judge. (5:04-cr-00241-FL-1)

    Submitted:

    December 17, 2009

    Decided:

    December 31, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Timothy Lafon Murphy, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rudy E. Renfer,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Timothy

    Lafon

    Murphy

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to


    18 U.S.C. 3582(c) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reversible

    error.

    reasons stated by the district court.

    we

    affirm

    for

    the

    United States v. Murphy,

    No. 5:04-cr-00241-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2009).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like