Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Francis, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Raymond Jerome Francis's "Motion of Complaint . . . And Request For Appropriate Relief." The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in United States v. Francis, No. 1:96-cr-00021-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009). The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-05-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-8259

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Raymond Jerome Francis's "Motion of Complaint . . . And Request For Appropriate Relief." The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in United States v. Francis, No. 1:96-cr-00021-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009). The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    United States v. Francis, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Raymond Jerome Francis's "Motion of Complaint . . . And Request For Appropriate Relief." The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons provided in United States v. Francis, No. 1:96-cr-00021-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009). The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-8259

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    RAYMOND JEROME FRANCIS, a/k/a Raymond Rudone Ramsey,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
    District Judge. (1:96-cr-00021-LHT-1)

    Submitted:

    April 29, 2010

    Decided:

    May 3, 2010

    Before MOTZ and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Raymond Jerome Francis, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Raymond

    Jerome

    Francis

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying his Motion of Complaint . . . And Request For


    Appropriate Relief.
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Francis, No. 1:96-cr-

    00021-LHT-1 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 11, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like