Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Buckner v. Warden, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    Robert Buckner and Vicki White, along with several other inmates, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against wardens and commissioners at various Maryland correctional facilities. The district court denied relief and the inmates appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court without further explanation.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-04-16 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 96-6005

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Robert Buckner and Vicki White, along with several other inmates, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against wardens and commissioners at various Maryland correctional facilities. The district court denied relief and the inmates appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court without further explanation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    Buckner v. Warden, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Robert Buckner and Vicki White, along with several other inmates, filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against wardens and commissioners at various Maryland correctional facilities. The district court denied relief and the inmates appealed. In an unpublished opinion, the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court adopted the reasoning of the district court without further explanation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 96-6005

    ROBERT LEON BUCKNER; VICKI LORRAINE WHITE,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    and
    GERALD DAVIS FULLER; MAURICE LIVELY; ALLEN
    EDWARD MAPP; JAMES MOYER; KEVIN FARROW; DANIEL
    GARDNER; PAUL LEO DAVIS; GARY IRELAND; MATHEW
    PORTER; JOHN TRACY COURTNEY; DELMAR PATRICK;
    JAMES HARRISON; GEORGE SAMS; CLARENCE PRUITT;
    MARK MCMILLAN; SHANE MCCALLUM; CLINT MYERS;
    STEVEN BRADLEY,
    Plaintiffs,
    versus
    WARDEN, Eastern Correctional Institution;
    WARDEN, Maryland Correctional Institution for
    Women; COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA95-3476-S)
    Submitted:

    March 21, 1996

    Decided:

    April 16, 1996

    Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Robert Leon Buckner, Vicki Lorraine White, Appellants Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying
    relief on their 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed
    the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Buckner v. Warden, No. CA-95-3476-S (D. Md. Dec. 6, 1995).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like