Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Arnold Clarke v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    Arnold Clarke appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against E.I. DuPont de Nemours for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished, per curiam opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court upheld the dismissal of Clarke's complaint against DuPont.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-09-03 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1699

    Original Title

    Arnold Clarke v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Arnold Clarke appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against E.I. DuPont de Nemours for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished, per curiam opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court upheld the dismissal of Clarke's complaint against DuPont.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    3 views2 pages

    Arnold Clarke v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Arnold Clarke appealed a district court's dismissal of his complaint against E.I. DuPont de Nemours for failing to state a claim. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the case and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The unpublished, per curiam opinion states that the facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the case materials and oral arguments are not necessary. The appeals court upheld the dismissal of Clarke's complaint against DuPont.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1699

    ARNOLD BENSON CLARKE,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, INCORPORATED,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    John A. Gibney, Jr.,
    District Judge. (3:13-cv-00206-JAG)

    Submitted:

    August 29, 2013

    Decided: September 3, 2013

    Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Arnold Benson Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Arnold

    Benson

    Clarke

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim.


    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Clarke v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., No. 3:13-

    cv-00206-JAG (E.D. Va. May 20, 2013).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like