Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Zheng v. INS, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    1) Dun Fang Zheng appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in affirming the decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the BIA's decision without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-04-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2480

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    1) Dun Fang Zheng appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in affirming the decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the BIA's decision without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Zheng v. INS, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Dun Fang Zheng appealed the Board of Immigration Appeals' (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge's denial of his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings. 2) The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in affirming the decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the BIA's decision without oral argument, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2480

    DUN FANG ZHENG,


    Petitioner,
    versus
    U.S. IMMIGRATION & NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
    Respondent.

    On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration


    Appeals. (A71-956-044)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 1999

    Decided:

    April 21, 1999

    Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Winston W. Tsai, Bethesda, Maryland, for Petitioner.
    Frank W.
    Hunger, Assistant Attorney General, Karen Fletcher Torstenson,
    Assistant Director, Joan E. Smiley, Senior Litigation Counsel,
    Office of Immigration Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES
    DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dun Fang Zheng appeals the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the Immigration Judges decision denying
    his motion to reopen his deportation proceedings.

    Our review of

    the record discloses that the Board did not abuse its discretion
    and its decision is without reversible error.
    firm on the reasoning of the Board.

    Accordingly, we af-

    Zheng v. INS, No. A71-956-044

    (B.I.A. Sep. 23, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like