Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Eury v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Muhammad Eury's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Eury's complaint failed to state a claim. The court therefore dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Eury v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Muhammad Eury's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Eury's complaint failed to state a claim. The court therefore dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-09-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-7003

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Muhammad Eury's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Eury's complaint failed to state a claim. The court therefore dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Eury v. Angelone, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing Muhammad Eury's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The court reviewed the record and agreed with the district court that Eury's complaint failed to state a claim. The court therefore dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-7003

    MUHAMMAD EURY,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    RONALD ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON; DUNCAN MILLS;
    GARY BASS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District
    Judge. (CA-01-257-1-2)

    Submitted:

    September 20, 2001

    Decided:

    September 27, 2001

    Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Muhammad Abd Saleem Eury, a state of Virginia inmate, appeals
    the district courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983
    (West Supp. 2001) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp.
    2001).

    We have reviewed the record and the district courts

    opinion and agree that Eurys complaint fails to state a claim.


    Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court.

    See Eury v. Angelone, No. CA-01-257-1-2 (E.D. Va. June 11,

    2001).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like