Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Dove v. Lenoir Cnty Sheriff, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    15 views2 pages
    This document is a court ruling that affirms the district court's denial of relief to Anthony Dove in his civil rights case against various defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It concurs with the district court's reasoning in rejecting Dove's claims. The ruling was unpublished, indicating it does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-04-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7805

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court ruling that affirms the district court's denial of relief to Anthony Dove in his civil rights case against various defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It concurs with the district court's reasoning in rejecting Dove's claims. The ruling was unpublished, indicating it does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    15 views2 pages

    Dove v. Lenoir Cnty Sheriff, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court ruling that affirms the district court's denial of relief to Anthony Dove in his civil rights case against various defendants. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible errors. It concurs with the district court's reasoning in rejecting Dove's claims. The ruling was unpublished, indicating it does not serve as binding legal precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7805

    ANTHONY DOVE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    LENOIR
    COUNTY
    SHERIFFS
    DEPARTMENT;
    CHRISTOPHER HILL, Detective; BRANSON VICKORY,
    District Attorney for District Eight; IMELDA
    PATE, Assistant District Attorney for District
    Eight-A; KINSTON FREE PRESS,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at New Bern.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-02-33-4-H)

    Submitted:

    April 1, 2003

    Decided:

    April 17, 2003

    Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Anthony Dove, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Allen Davis, WOMBLE, CARLYLE,
    SANDRIDGE & RICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; David J. Adinolfi, II,
    Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Julia Furr
    Youngman, ELLIS & WINTERS, L.L.P., Raleigh, North Carolina; John
    Adam Bussian, III, THE BUSSIAN LAW FIRM, P.L.L.C., Raleigh, North
    Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Anthony Dove appeals the district courts order denying relief
    on his complaint under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000).

    We have reviewed

    the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on


    the reasoning of the district court.

    See Dove v. Lenoir County

    Sheriffs Dept, No. CA-02-33-4-H (E.D.N.C. Oct. 15, 2002).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like