Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Brown v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his imprisonment. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Brown appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-05-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-6128

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his imprisonment. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Brown appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Brown v. Brooks, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, filed a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 challenging his imprisonment. The district court denied relief, accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge. Brown appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-6128

    CHARLES BROWN,
    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOSEPH M.
    COMMISSION,

    BROOKS;

    UNITED

    STATES

    PAROLE
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-03-346-2)

    Submitted:

    May 12, 2004

    Decided:

    May 21, 2004

    Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Charles Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia Lynn Van Valkenburg,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Charles Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
    courts order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge
    and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. 2241
    (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See


    Brown v. Brooks, No. CA-03-346-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 26, 2003).

    We

    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like