Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Newby v. Callahan, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eddie Leon Newby of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Newby v. Callahan, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eddie Leon Newby of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-04-30 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-6014

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eddie Leon Newby of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Newby v. Callahan, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Eddie Leon Newby of the denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. §2254. The Fourth Circuit reviewed the district court record and found no reversible error in the district court's denial of relief. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court's earlier opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-6014

    EDDIE LEON NEWBY,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN T. CALLAHAN, III; MARK KANTRO, P.C.;
    WILLIAM RUTHERFORD,
    Respondents - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District
    Judge. (CA-96-1614-A)
    Submitted:

    April 17, 1997

    Decided:

    April 30, 1997

    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior


    Circuit Judge.
    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Eddie Leon Newby, Appellant Pro Se.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2254 (West 1994 &
    Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning
    of the district court. Newby v. Callahan, No. CA-96-1614-A (E.D.
    Va. Nov. 18, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like