Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    McKinney v. US Dept of Labor, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of partial summary judgment to the United States Department of Labor in a case brought by Herbert and Hubert McKinney. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's March 25, 1996 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    McKinney v. US Dept of Labor, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of partial summary judgment to the United States Department of Labor in a case brought by Herbert and Hubert McKinney. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's March 25, 1996 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2000-03-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-2118

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of partial summary judgment to the United States Department of Labor in a case brought by Herbert and Hubert McKinney. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's March 25, 1996 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    McKinney v. US Dept of Labor, 4th Cir. (2000)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's granting of partial summary judgment to the United States Department of Labor in a case brought by Herbert and Hubert McKinney. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's ruling. The appeals court affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning in that court's March 25, 1996 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-2118

    HERBERT MCKINNEY; HUBERT MCKINNEY,


    Plaintiffs - Appellants,
    versus
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Secretary,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley. Joseph Robert Goodwin, District
    Judge. (CA-95-160-5)

    Submitted:

    March 7, 2000

    Decided:

    March 17, 2000

    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Theodore R. Dues, Jr., Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellants.
    Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Michael L. Keller,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Herbert and Hubert McKinney appeal the district courts order
    granting partial summary judgment to Defendant.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district courts opinion and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    See McKinney v. United States Dept of Labor, No. CA-95-

    160-5 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 25, 1996).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like