Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Stanley Harvey Davis's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2005-08-02 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-6036

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Stanley Harvey Davis's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views2 pages

    Davis v. United States, 4th Cir. (2005)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Stanley Harvey Davis's appeal of the district court's denial of relief on his petitions filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The appeals court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues adequately presented in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-6036

    STANLEY HARVEY DAVIS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; ARTHUR F. BEELER,
    Warden,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
    Malcolm J. Howard,
    District Judge. (CA-04-246-5-H; CA-04-369-5-H)

    Submitted:

    July 27, 2005

    Decided:

    August 2, 2005

    Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Stanley Harvey Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr.,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Stanley Harvey Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals the
    district courts order denying relief on his petitions filed under
    28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000).
    reversible error.
    district court.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    See Davis v. United States, Nos. CA-04-246-5-H;

    CA-04-369-5-H (E.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 2004).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like