Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 7 views

    Jackson v. Palmetto Baptist, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Iris Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Palmetto Baptist Hospital. The district court denied relief and Jackson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief and also denied all pending motions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Jackson v. Palmetto Baptist, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Iris Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Palmetto Baptist Hospital. The district court denied relief and Jackson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief and also denied all pending motions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-07-26 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 05-2428

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Iris Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Palmetto Baptist Hospital. The district court denied relief and Jackson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief and also denied all pending motions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    Jackson v. Palmetto Baptist, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Iris Jackson filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Palmetto Baptist Hospital. The district court denied relief and Jackson appealed. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The court affirmed the district court's order denying relief and also denied all pending motions. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 05-2428

    IRIS G. JACKSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    PALMETTO BAPTIST HOSPITAL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Columbia.
    Cameron McGowan Currie, District
    Judge. (CA-05-1901-CMC)

    Submitted:

    June 21, 2006

    Decided:

    July 26, 2006

    Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Iris G. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se.


    South Carolina, for Appellee.

    James E. Parham, Jr., Irmo,

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Iris

    G.

    Jackson

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on her 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    the district courts order. Jackson v. Palmetto Baptist Hosp., No.


    CA-05-1901-CMC (D.S.C. Nov. 18, 2005).
    motions.

    We also deny all pending

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like