Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Luck v. Childress, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Luck's § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-07-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-6184

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Luck's § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Luck v. Childress, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Kevin Luck's § 1983 complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-6184

    KEVIN M. LUCK,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SERGEANT CHILDRESS, Danville City;
    ALIBANZA; NURSE TURNER; NURSE STAPP,

    DOCTOR
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:06-cv-00726-JLK)

    Submitted: July 19, 2007

    Decided:

    July 24, 2007

    Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin M. Luck, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin

    M.

    Luck

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.


    1915A(b) (2000).

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    See Luck v. Childress, No. 7:06-cv-00726-JLK

    (W.D. Va. Jan. 4, 2007).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like