Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 9 views

    Goods v. Hairston, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Obbie L. Goods in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations denying Goods' complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Goods v. Hairston, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Obbie L. Goods in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations denying Goods' complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2008-10-09 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7571

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Obbie L. Goods in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations denying Goods' complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    9 views2 pages

    Goods v. Hairston, 4th Cir. (2008)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to Obbie L. Goods in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's adoption of the magistrate judge's reports and recommendations denying Goods' complaint. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7571

    OBBIE L. GOODS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    GWEN HAIRSTON; B. J. BARNES, Sheriff; C. J. WILLIAMSON,
    Division Commander,
    Defendants -

    Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
    District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr.,
    District Judge. (1:01-cv-00026-NCT)

    Submitted:

    June 9, 2008

    Decided:

    October 9, 2008

    Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Obbie L. Goods, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Price Weaver, Richard


    David Yeoman, BROTHERTON, FORD, YEOMAN & BERRY, PLLC, Greensboro,
    North Carolina; Susan D. Moore, COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE,
    Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Obbie

    L.

    Goods

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    orders

    adopting reports and recommendations of the magistrate judge and


    denying relief on Goods 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court. Goods v. Hairston, No. 1:01-cv-00026-NCT (M.D.N.C. Oct. 21,
    2002 & Sept. 24, 2007).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like