Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10 views

    Martin v. Hatfield, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Viston Shyrock Martin's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice as frivolous. Martin appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against several prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Martin v. Hatfield, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    10 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Viston Shyrock Martin's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice as frivolous. Martin appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against several prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-10-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 10-7053

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Viston Shyrock Martin's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice as frivolous. Martin appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against several prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    10 views2 pages

    Martin v. Hatfield, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of Viston Shyrock Martin's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint without prejudice as frivolous. Martin appealed the district court's dismissal of his complaint against several prison officials. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's dismissal for the reasons stated in its opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 10-7053

    VISTON SHYROCK MARTIN,


    Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    SERGEANT HATFIELD; T. LOWE, IHO; SERGEANT OWENS; RANDY C.
    MATHENA, Warden,
    Defendants Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Jackson L. Kiser, Senior
    District Judge. (7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu)

    Submitted:

    October 19, 2010

    Decided:

    October 28, 2010

    Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Viston Shyrock Martin, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Viston

    Shyrock

    Martin

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint without


    prejudice as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b)(1) (2006).
    have

    reviewed

    the

    record

    and

    find

    no

    reversible

    We

    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district


    court.

    Martin v. Hatfield, No. 7:10-cv-00262-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va.

    July 23, 2010).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like