Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marion Davis' motion to require the Government to file a Rule 35 motion. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It affirms the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Davis from May 18, 2006. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7054

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marion Davis' motion to require the Government to file a Rule 35 motion. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It affirms the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Davis from May 18, 2006. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    7 views2 pages

    United States v. Davis, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a 3-sentence summary of a United States Court of Appeals case. It affirms the district court's denial of Marion Davis' motion to require the Government to file a Rule 35 motion. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. It affirms the lower court's ruling for the reasons stated in United States v. Davis from May 18, 2006. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7054

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    MARION MADISON DAVIS,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior
    District Judge. (2:96-cr-00053-HCM)

    Submitted: October 17, 2006

    Decided: October 20, 2006

    Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Marion Madison Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Michael Comstock,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Marion Madison Davis appeals the district courts order
    denying his motion to require the Government to file a Fed. R.
    Crim. P. 35 motion.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by


    the district court.

    United States v. Davis, No. 2:96-cr-00053-HCM

    (E.D. Va. May 18, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because

    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the


    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument

    would

    not

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like