Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Madeline Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    19 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Madeline Moses' civil complaint against the American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services and several employees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted Moses' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-10-21 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 13-1842

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Madeline Moses' civil complaint against the American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services and several employees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted Moses' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    19 views2 pages

    Madeline Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's order dismissing Madeline Moses' civil complaint against the American Red Cross Carolinas Region Blood Services and several employees. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It granted Moses' request to proceed in forma pauperis but dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal contentions were adequately presented.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 13-1842

    MADELINE LEIGH MOSES,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    AMERICAN RED CROSS CAROLINAS REGION BLOOD SERVICES (ARC);
    PEGGY HUFFMAN; LASHION DARDEN; ERIC HINSON; DELORES SMALLS;
    JOYCE BRENDEL,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of North Carolina, at Wilmington.
    Terrence W. Boyle,
    District Judge. (7:12-cv-00306-BO)

    Submitted:

    October 17, 2013

    Decided: October 21, 2013

    Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Madeline Leigh Moses, Appellant Pro Se.


    Brian Lee Church,
    Angelique Regail Vincent, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA,
    Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Madeline
    order

    dismissing

    Leigh
    her

    Moses

    civil

    appeals

    the

    complaint.

    record and find no reversible error.

    We

    Carolinas

    Region

    Blood

    (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013).


    pauperis.
    legal
    before

    have

    courts

    reviewed

    the

    Accordingly, we affirm for

    the reasons stated by the district court.


    Cross

    district

    Servs.,

    See Moses v. Am. Red


    No.

    7:12-cv-00306-BO

    We grant leave to proceed in forma

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    contentions
    this

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in
    aid

    the
    the

    materials
    decisional

    process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like