Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    United States v. Ernest Perry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Perry appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Perry's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Ernest Perry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    Ernest Perry appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Perry's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2013-02-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-7602

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ernest Perry appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Perry's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    United States v. Ernest Perry, 4th Cir. (2013)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ernest Perry appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Perry's motion for a sentence reduction.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-7602

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    ERNEST PERRY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    Henry E. Hudson, District
    Judge. (3:08-cr-00399-HEH-1)

    Submitted:

    February 1, 2013

    Decided:

    February 22, 2013

    Before KING, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ernest Perry, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Ernest
    denying

    his

    Perry

    motion

    for

    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    appeals
    a

    the

    sentence

    district

    reduction

    courts
    under

    18

    order
    U.S.C.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    See United States v. Perry, No. 3:08-cr-

    00399-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 10, 2012).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before this court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like