Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 6 views

    Banks v. San-J International, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Velma Banks appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to San-J International in her civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its November 29, 2000 and January 18, 2001 rulings. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Banks v. San-J International, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views2 pages
    Velma Banks appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to San-J International in her civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its November 29, 2000 and January 18, 2001 rulings. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-10-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-1008

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Velma Banks appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to San-J International in her civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its November 29, 2000 and January 18, 2001 rulings. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    6 views2 pages

    Banks v. San-J International, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Velma Banks appealed a district court's granting of summary judgment to San-J International in her civil action. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appellate court reviewed the record and district court opinion and affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the lower court in its November 29, 2000 and January 18, 2001 rulings. The appellate court determined oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-1008

    VELMA V. BANKS,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SAN-J INTERNATIONAL,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge.
    (CA-00-184-3)

    Submitted:

    September 25, 2001

    Decided:

    October 15, 2001

    Before MICHAEL, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Velma V. Banks, Appellant Pro Se. William Carter Younger, James
    LeRoy Banks, Jr., MCGUIREWOODS, L.L.P., Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Velma V. Banks appeals the district courts order granting
    summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action.

    We have

    reviewed the record and the district courts opinion and find no
    reversible error.
    district court.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


    Banks v. San-J Intl, No. CA-00-184-3 (E.D. Va.

    Nov. 29, 2000 & Jan. 18, 2001).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like