Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Williams v. Mackling, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views3 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by John Ruffin Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various police officers and corrections officers. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error, and denies Williams' motion for judgment which reargues the merits of his claims. The appellate court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2007-12-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 07-7143

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by John Ruffin Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various police officers and corrections officers. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error, and denies Williams' motion for judgment which reargues the merits of his claims. The appellate court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views3 pages

    Williams v. Mackling, 4th Cir. (2007)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by John Ruffin Williams under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various police officers and corrections officers. The district court had dismissed Williams' complaint for failure to state a claim. The appellate court affirms the district court's decision, finding no reversible error, and denies Williams' motion for judgment which reargues the merits of his claims. The appellate court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 07-7143

    JOHN RUFFIN WILLIAMS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JERRY L. MACKLING; STEVEN BAILY, Police
    Officer;
    L.
    MARSHALL,
    Sergeant,
    Police
    Officer; S. J. THOMPSON, Sergeant, Police
    Officer; SERGEANT DEPOY, Corrections Officer;
    LIEUTENANT
    WYNKOOP,
    Corrections
    Officer;
    COLONEL LAND, Corrections Officer Supervisor also
    known as Major Land; GLENN HILL, Sheriff, Corrections
    Officer Superintendent also known as Colonel Hill;
    NURSE JOSH, Corrections Facility Nurse on
    Duty; CARAL PRICE; SELWYN ADAMS, Dr., M.D.,
    Corrections Facility Physician; K. HAMLIN,
    Corrections
    Facility
    Unit
    S-1
    Nurse
    Supervisor; S. TAPPS, Corrections Facility Unit
    S-1 Grievance Coordinator; R. WOODSON, Corrections
    Facility Unit S-1 Grievance Coordinator,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
    Judge. (2:07-cv-00147-RBS)

    Submitted:

    December 20, 2007

    Decided:

    December 27, 2007

    Before MICHAEL and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John Ruffin Williams, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    - 2 -

    PER CURIAM:
    John Ruffin Williams appeals the district courts order
    dismissing his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
    1915A(b)(1) (2000) for failure to state a claim.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, Williams v.


    Mackling,

    No.

    2:07-cv-147

    (E.D.

    Va.

    Jul

    2,

    2007),

    and

    deny

    Williams motion for judgment, in which he reargues the merits of


    his claims.

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before


    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 3 -

    You might also like