Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 11 views

    Scott v. Norfolk Southern Cor, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Scott filed a civil action against Norfolk Southern Corporation and several of its employees alleging post-employment discrimination. The district court denied Scott relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing there was no basis to overturn the denial of relief to Scott.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Scott v. Norfolk Southern Cor, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views2 pages
    Michael Scott filed a civil action against Norfolk Southern Corporation and several of its employees alleging post-employment discrimination. The district court denied Scott relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing there was no basis to overturn the denial of relief to Scott.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1999-01-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1098

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Scott filed a civil action against Norfolk Southern Corporation and several of its employees alleging post-employment discrimination. The district court denied Scott relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing there was no basis to overturn the denial of relief to Scott.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    11 views2 pages

    Scott v. Norfolk Southern Cor, 4th Cir. (1999)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Scott filed a civil action against Norfolk Southern Corporation and several of its employees alleging post-employment discrimination. The district court denied Scott relief and he appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and district court orders and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's rulings, agreeing there was no basis to overturn the denial of relief to Scott.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1098

    MICHAEL A. SCOTT,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION; DAVID R. GOODE;
    STEPHEN CRAIG TOBIAS; JON L. MANETTA; DONALD
    W. MAYBERRY; WILLIAM E. HONEYCUTT; LEWIS D.
    HALE; TIMOTHY A. HEILIG; C. D. VITTUR; D. D.
    GRAAB; A. L. LUTTRELL; JERRY R. GRAY; W. F.
    HENLEY; J. E. PAIR,
    Defendants - Appellees,
    and
    J.
    W.
    CLEMMER;
    INCORPORATED,

    LANDMARK

    COMMUNICATIONS,
    Defendants.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District
    Judge. (CA-97-522-2)

    Submitted:

    December 22, 1998

    Decided:

    January 15, 1999

    Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Michael A. Scott, Appellant Pro Se. David Nash Payne, KAUFMAN &
    CANOLES, Norfolk, Virginia; Samuel Johnson Webster, Heather Ann
    Mullen, WILLIAMS, KELLY & GREER, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Michael Scott appeals from district court orders denying him
    relief in his civil action in which he asserted various claims related to alleged post-employment discrimination.

    We have reviewed

    the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible
    error.

    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

    court.

    Scott v. Norfolk Southern Corp., No. CA-97-522-2 (E.D. Va.

    Dec. 18, 1997, July 10, 1998).

    We dispense with oral argument

    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in


    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like