Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Massey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Michelle Hardin Massey appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Massey that Massey's motion for a sentence reduction should be denied. The unpublished opinion establishes no binding precedent and the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2009-07-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-6616

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michelle Hardin Massey appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Massey that Massey's motion for a sentence reduction should be denied. The unpublished opinion establishes no binding precedent and the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Massey, 4th Cir. (2009)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michelle Hardin Massey appealed the district court's denial of her motion to reduce her sentence. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling, agreeing with the reasons stated in United States v. Massey that Massey's motion for a sentence reduction should be denied. The unpublished opinion establishes no binding precedent and the appeals court dispensed with oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-6616

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    MICHELLE HARDIN MASSEY,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
    Graham C. Mullen,
    Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00210-GCM-CH-3)

    Submitted:

    May 19, 2009

    Decided:

    July 8, 2009

    Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Michelle Hardin Massey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Amy Elizabeth Ray,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Michelle

    Hardin

    Massey

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order denying her motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.


    3582(c)(2) (2006).
    reversible error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no

    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

    by the district court.

    United States v. Massey, No. 3:00-cr-

    00210-GCM-CH-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 12, 2009).

    We dispense with oral

    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately


    presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like