Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 2 views

    United States v. Logan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronnie Logan appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that Logan did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Logan's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    United States v. Logan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    Ronnie Logan appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that Logan did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Logan's appeal.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2003-01-07 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7543

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronnie Logan appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that Logan did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Logan's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. Logan, 4th Cir. (2003)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronnie Logan appealed the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside or correct his sentence. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and agreed with the district court's reasons for denying the motion. Specifically, the Court found that Logan did not make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. As a result, the Court denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed Logan's appeal.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7543

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    RONNIE LOGAN,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
    District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Richard L. Voorhees,
    District Judge. (CR-00-68, CA-02-274)

    Submitted:

    December 19, 2002

    Decided:

    January 7, 2003

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Ronnie Logan, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant


    United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Ronnie Logan seeks to appeal the district courts order
    denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (2000).
    We have reviewed the record and conclude for the reasons stated by
    the district court that Logan has not made a substantial showing of
    the denial of a constitutional right.

    See United States v. Logan,

    Nos. CR-00-68; CA-02-274 (W.D.N.C. filed July 29, 2002 & entered
    July 30, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability
    and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 2253(c) (2000). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like