Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 5 views

    Gary R. Wilkins v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, 62 F.3d 1415, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling denying a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Gary R. Wilkins v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, 62 F.3d 1415, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling denying a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-08-10 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 62 F.3d 1415 Docket: 95-6470

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling denying a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    5 views1 page

    Gary R. Wilkins v. Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, 62 F.3d 1415, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling denying a petitioner's appeal of a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief. The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning or decision. As a result, the appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf
    of 1

    62 F.

    3d 1415

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Gary R. WILKINS, Petitioner--Appellant,
    v.
    DIRECTOR OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF
    CORRECTIONS, Respondent--Appellee.
    No. 95-6470.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Aug. 10, 1995.

    Gary R. Wilkins, petitioner pro se.


    Susan Campbell Alexander, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for
    appellee.
    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. Wilkins v. Director of Va. Dep't of Corrections, No. CA-941441-AM (E.D.Va. Mar. 7, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the
    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    You might also like